![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjhsR8ROX40v0yii6SRChiTzfa9Pa_JzepbNhZZg-VkFgBJo7H-H4_Y6zcIpHdcMAXlfiisH8CPxMPgsezmgVq38w3lTci4ST1H9eU3Z-nn0DMIee2i6-B2P5ooXvoow2-KOQL7I2w7pbYa/s400/crudites3494.jpg)
Last night I tried to make something like the remembered dish -- tomatoes, grated carrots, lightly marinated mushrooms, cucumbers in cream, grated cabbage... Cru means raw -- crudités are simple, raw vegetables.
Crudités do not appear in any of my cookbooks, not in American-French (like Julia Child) nor in translated or untranslated French cookbooks like Madame Maigret's Recipes that I described yesterday. Crudités were too simple and obvious. Who needs a recipe for raw vegetables? Only Ginette Mathiot's 1955 La Cuisine Pour Tous suggested "Hors D'Oeuvres Cru" with a list of possible elements in this dish, to be served by themselves or in combination.
The word crudités has been completely adapted into English, meaning any preparation of raw vegetables, from something like the French tradition to a plate with carrot sticks, celery sticks, bell pepper strips, and ranch dressing as a dip. On some French websites I even noticed a reference to guacamole as a dip. Dipping food into a common bowl would have seemed very unFrench at the time we were eating crudités in little restaurants -- but as I say, both words and dishes can change. I wonder how much change has happened to madelines -- now available everywhere thanks to Proust's passage making them so famous.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar